<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Habitat: a good response to social stupidity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wildfirepr.co.uk/2009/06/habitat-a-good-response-to-social-stupidity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wildfirepr.co.uk/2009/06/habitat-a-good-response-to-social-stupidity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildfire PR &#8211; Business and Consumer Technology Public Relations : Blog Archive : Google real-time: potential PR disaster or opportunity</title>
		<link>http://blog.wildfirepr.co.uk/2009/06/habitat-a-good-response-to-social-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-8551</link>
		<dc:creator>Wildfire PR &#8211; Business and Consumer Technology Public Relations : Blog Archive : Google real-time: potential PR disaster or opportunity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wildfirepr.co.uk/?p=216#comment-8551</guid>
		<description>[...] searches could severely escalate crisis management situations. If you think of incidents like the Habitat fiasco, real-time results takes this beyond just a Twitter trending topic into a totally new sphere. This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] searches could severely escalate crisis management situations. If you think of incidents like the Habitat fiasco, real-time results takes this beyond just a Twitter trending topic into a totally new sphere. This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildfire PR &#8211; Business and Consumer Technology Public Relations : Blog Archive : Reaching an audience through social media</title>
		<link>http://blog.wildfirepr.co.uk/2009/06/habitat-a-good-response-to-social-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-6609</link>
		<dc:creator>Wildfire PR &#8211; Business and Consumer Technology Public Relations : Blog Archive : Reaching an audience through social media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wildfirepr.co.uk/?p=216#comment-6609</guid>
		<description>[...] have been slow to respond to backlash only to see the situation spiral out of control very quickly. Habitat is a good example. When the furnishings company let an intern loose on Twitter, there was a lot of anger directed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been slow to respond to backlash only to see the situation spiral out of control very quickly. Habitat is a good example. When the furnishings company let an intern loose on Twitter, there was a lot of anger directed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig McGill</title>
		<link>http://blog.wildfirepr.co.uk/2009/06/habitat-a-good-response-to-social-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig McGill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wildfirepr.co.uk/?p=216#comment-4131</guid>
		<description>And what I really want to know is this: at http://twitter.com/habitatuk it says they are following 4 people, yet there are more than 4 followee&#039;s in the sidebar. Then when you click on the followers, you only get one - Innocent Drinks. So are they following lots? Four? One?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what I really want to know is this: at <a href="http://twitter.com/habitatuk" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/habitatuk</a> it says they are following 4 people, yet there are more than 4 followee&#8217;s in the sidebar. Then when you click on the followers, you only get one &#8211; Innocent Drinks. So are they following lots? Four? One?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig McGill</title>
		<link>http://blog.wildfirepr.co.uk/2009/06/habitat-a-good-response-to-social-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-4130</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig McGill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wildfirepr.co.uk/?p=216#comment-4130</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so forgiving: the apology took too long to turn up and whoever was advising them on this in the first place should have spotted that it wasn&#039;t on, so they either have a muppet in house or hired a muppet to do this.

Also, the apology appeared at 1pm-ish today after the mainstream media picked up on it - even though there&#039;s been outrage for a good 24 hours before that - so that suggests to me there&#039;s been a case of &#039;oh no, big media on it now, we better apologise&#039;.

At least they did apologise. I&#039;ll give them that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so forgiving: the apology took too long to turn up and whoever was advising them on this in the first place should have spotted that it wasn&#8217;t on, so they either have a muppet in house or hired a muppet to do this.</p>
<p>Also, the apology appeared at 1pm-ish today after the mainstream media picked up on it &#8211; even though there&#8217;s been outrage for a good 24 hours before that &#8211; so that suggests to me there&#8217;s been a case of &#8216;oh no, big media on it now, we better apologise&#8217;.</p>
<p>At least they did apologise. I&#8217;ll give them that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
